Search Webtechi

Friday, March 11, 2011

Nehru-Gandhi Family Secrets : See The Real Nehru (The First PM Of India)

INTERESTING HISTORY!
At the very beginning of his book, "The Nehru Dynasty", astrologer K.N.Rao
mentions the names of Jawaharlal's father and grandfather.
Jawahar Lal's father was believed to be Motilal and Motilal's father was one
Gangadhar Nehru.
And we all know that Jawaharlal's only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru;
Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis.




She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage with Feroze.
Why? No one tells us that!
Now, who is this Feroze?
We are told by many that he was the son of the family grocer.
The grocer supplied wines,etc. to Anand Bhavan (previously known as Ishrat
Manzil)
What was the family grocer's name?
One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru.
But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the
maternal grandfathers.
In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in
most societies.
Why is it then, no where, we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather's name?
It appears that the reason is simply this. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather
was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat.
This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi
woman after converting her to Islam.
This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived.Rajiv's father Feroze, was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's wishes.
Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis
and this was changed to Gandhi,sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an
affidavit.
The fact of the matter isthat (and this fact can be found in many writings)
Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Guru Dev
Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by herself,
while father Jawahar was busy with politics, pretty women and illicit sex;
the mother was in hospital.
Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and he was quite
sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a
Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque.
Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this
marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (better known as
Mahatma Gandhi).
Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man
to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of
religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance.
It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit.And so Feroze Khan
became Feroze Gandhi.
The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared
India's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation' didn't mention this game of his in
the famous book, 'My Experiments with Truth'.Why?
When they returned to India, amock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public
consumption.
On this subject,writes M.O. Mathai (a longtime Private Secretary of Nehru) in his
renowned
 (but now suppressed by the GOI! ) 'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age'
on page94, second paragraph: "
For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed
the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942.An inter-religious
and inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To
be legal, it had to be a civil marriage
."
It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived separately,but
they were not divorced.
Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's
political activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the
Prime Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan.
Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The
death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political forces, is
itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry.














Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions and
deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of Indira (or
Mrs.Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi
 was not the son of Feroze.
He was the son of another Muslim gentleman, Mohammad Yunus.
Here, in passing, we might mention that the second son was originally named
Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name.
It was changed to Sanjay when he was arrested by the British police in England
and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car.
Krishna Menon was then India's High Commissioner in London. He offered to
issue another passport to the felon
 who changed his name to Sanjay.
Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh girlMenaka (now they call her
Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of mythological Lord Indra's Court
dancer rather offensive !!)took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus's
house in New Delhi.
And the marriage with Menaka who was a model (She had model for Bombay
Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so ordinary either.
Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was
rendered pregnant by Sanjay.
It was then that her father,Colonel Anand, threatened Sanjay with dire
consequences if he did not marry her daughter. And that did the trick.
Sanjay married Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that
Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka.
Apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice.
It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane
accident.
In Yunus's book, 'Persons, Passions & Politics' one discovers that baby
Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the
reason stated was phimosis.
It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and
due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to
run the country as though it were his personal freedom.
Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was?
When the news of Sanjay's death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thingshe wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had withhim.

Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards.
At least one case is very graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his
"Reminiscences of the NehruAge", page 206.
Mathai writes:
"In the autumn of 1948 a young woman from Benares arrived in New
Delhi as a sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real
name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian
scriptures and mythology.People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear
her discourses. One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought
a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the
PM's house. As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that
she was young, shapely and beautiful.Meetings of Nehru with her
became rather frequent, mostly after he finished his work at night. During
one of Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there and
Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply
and she visited Nehru at midnight...“
Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared.
In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to
Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern
India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby
boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself.
She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left
the child behind.
She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, amongother things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, whowas a foreigner, had the letters examined and was told they were from thePrime Minister.
The person who brought the letters surrendered them..."I (Mathai) made
discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his
hereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely tightlipped and
secretive.
Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He musthave grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his fatherwas."
Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi,
we all know now that he changed his so called Parsi religion to become a
Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy.
Rajiv became Roberto.
His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul.
Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka
and Rahul.
What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance in such matters.
The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London aftertaking over asPrime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajivboasted that hewas NOT a Hindu but a Parsi.
Mind you, speaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all.
His grandmother (father's mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned the
Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan.
It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv.
From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post,
the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven.
The children's encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical
Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are
among the most misinformed in the world today!
The reality is that in all three years of his tenure atthat University Rajiv had not
passed a single exam. He had therefore toleave Cambridge without a
certificate.
Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be a student
in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a
student in Cambridge all right, but not of the University of Cambridge , but of
one of those fly by night language schools where foreign students come to
learn English. Sonia was working as an 'au pair' girl in Cambridge and trying to
learn English at the same time.
And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic rites in full
view of India's public.
This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now a foreignerl eads a
prestigious national party because of just one qualification being married into
the Nehru family.
Maneka Gandhi, though Indian, herself is being accepted by the non-Congress
parties not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but for her
links to the Nehru family.
Saying that an Italian (or any foreigner) should not lead India will amount to
narrow mindedness, but if Sania Maino (now Sonia) had served India like, say,
Mother Teresa or Annie Besant, i.e. in anyway on her own rights, then all
Indians should be proud of her just as how proud we are of Mother Teresa.
OR
Saying that any other party which comes to rule India is better is again equally
worse.
The point is Indians who nominate the people to stand in these elections; and
the people who vote their rulers (i.e. the authorities) must know thattruth
eventually come out some day.
Dont allow the famous land of India(our motherland) to be looked down
by others.
Spare a moment and check the background of each nominee.
A good-well nourished tree
always
bear good fruit.
You are responsible too.